|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
John Cowan
(19 May 2011 21:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(20 May 2011 09:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alex Queiroz
(20 May 2011 09:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless Alaric Snell-Pym (23 May 2011 10:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Eli Barzilay
(23 May 2011 10:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 08:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Emmanuel Medernach
(24 May 2011 08:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alaric Snell-Pym
(24 May 2011 09:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 May 2011 18:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: when and unless
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 May 2011 19:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
leppie
(24 May 2011 08:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 09:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
leppie
(24 May 2011 09:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
John Cowan
(24 May 2011 14:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 14:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 May 2011 18:56 UTC)
|
On 05/20/11 10:31, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > Also, while and until macros encourage bad habits. Do we want to > attract beginners by making them write fortran code in parentheses? FWIW, I never use while and until... I just reach for the named let. It's general, so I only have to remember how it works once. I feel I ought to learn myself "when", though, to disambiguate those one-armed ifs in imperative code... That's a change worth making IMHO. > > P. > ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
