Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
John Cowan
(19 May 2011 21:42 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(20 May 2011 09:32 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alex Queiroz
(20 May 2011 09:38 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 10:36 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless Eli Barzilay (23 May 2011 10:41 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 08:25 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Emmanuel Medernach
(24 May 2011 08:37 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alaric Snell-Pym
(24 May 2011 09:06 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 May 2011 18:57 UTC)
|
Re: when and unless
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 May 2011 19:35 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
leppie
(24 May 2011 08:51 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 09:06 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
leppie
(24 May 2011 09:23 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
John Cowan
(24 May 2011 14:51 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 14:57 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 May 2011 18:56 UTC)
|
Four minutes ago, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > On 05/20/11 10:31, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > > > Also, while and until macros encourage bad habits. Do we want to > > attract beginners by making them write fortran code in > > parentheses? > > FWIW, I never use while and until... I just reach for the named let. > It's general, so I only have to remember how it works once. Named lets have another advantage -- they don't make side effects necessary like while/until loops. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports