Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (30 Oct 2010 07:00 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aubrey Jaffer (30 Oct 2010 14:14 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aaron W. Hsu (30 Oct 2010 22:05 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (30 Oct 2010 22:46 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aubrey Jaffer (30 Oct 2010 23:03 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (31 Oct 2010 06:16 UTC)

Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aubrey Jaffer 30 Oct 2010 14:12 UTC

 | Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:59:52 -0400
 | From: John Cowan <cowan-x6Fv9fcoW1Y+uZM1RHzMvw@public.gmane.org>
 |
 | Aubrey Jaffer scripsit:
 |
 | > Exposing port-numbers to the programmer leads to resource leaks
 | > (orphaned ports).
 |
 | I don't understand that.  The SCM socket:bind, socket:connect, and
 | socket-name:port-number procedures all expose port numbers, and I
 | don't understand how you can implement TFTP without knowing about
 | them.
 |
 | Are you momentarily confusing port numbers with file descriptors?

Oops; yes.