Re: [Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand
Christian Stigen Larsen 07 Jan 2013 07:25 UTC
Quoting John Cowan (cowan@mercury.ccil.org):
|
| Christian Stigen Larsen scripsit:
| > Draft 8 does not say whether the return value for an unmatched
| > cond-expand is unspecified.
|
| [...]
|
| Without a vote, we can't override the previous vote. I do not feel
| inclined to call for such a vote myself at this point, though other WG
| members may feel differently.
Here's to wishing the WG makes such a vote.
--
Christian Stigen Larsen
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports