Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Denis Washington (15 Oct 2011 07:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Jeronimo Pellegrini (15 Oct 2011 12:06 UTC)
Re: Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Oct 2011 04:46 UTC)
Re: Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Oct 2011 21:08 UTC)
Re: Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler (17 Oct 2011 06:27 UTC)
[Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen (16 Oct 2011 14:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (17 Oct 2011 06:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (17 Oct 2011 23:39 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen (20 Oct 2011 12:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger (25 Oct 2011 00:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (25 Oct 2011 02:17 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (20 Oct 2011 08:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger (20 Oct 2011 17:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (20 Oct 2011 17:46 UTC)
Re: Legacy caar to cddddr Arthur A. Gleckler (20 Oct 2011 17:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (20 Oct 2011 20:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (20 Oct 2011 22:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (21 Oct 2011 02:48 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (22 Oct 2011 00:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (23 Oct 2011 05:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (20 Oct 2011 17:52 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Grant Rettke (21 Oct 2011 02:34 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (21 Oct 2011 02:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (21 Oct 2011 02:56 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Grant Rettke (21 Oct 2011 20:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (22 Oct 2011 00:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (22 Oct 2011 14:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (22 Oct 2011 17:56 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (22 Oct 2011 19:15 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (22 Oct 2011 20:31 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (23 Oct 2011 08:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (23 Oct 2011 19:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Denis Washington (22 Oct 2011 19:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (24 Oct 2011 00:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (23 Oct 2011 05:39 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (23 Oct 2011 08:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen (23 Oct 2011 11:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (23 Oct 2011 15:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (23 Oct 2011 16:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (23 Oct 2011 18:14 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer 20 Oct 2011 20:17 UTC

 | Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:45:51 -0400
 | From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
 |
 | Ray Dillinger scripsit:
 |
 | > It was possible to implement a general macro version (that parsed
 | > the token and expanded it as far as necessary) of the "c(a|d)+r"
 | > operators using the old "explode" and "implode" commands to
 | > destructure the symbol itself, but those have been eliminated
 | > since, I think, R4RS. And I don't think it would work with
 | > current macrology anyway.
 |
 | Surely it would not.
 |
 | I once wrote a traditional Lisp (not Scheme or CL) interpreter once
 | that handled these directly in EVAL.  If a symbol in operator
 | position had no definition, it was checked for being of the right
 | form, and if so, its argument was evaluated and the c*r was
 | executed on the spot.  It didn't work in APPLY, more by oversight
 | than anything else.

In SCM, C*R and single-argument real-valued numerical functions (both
have type-code tc7_cxr) are dispatched in the interpreter.  The C*R
objects have a null CDR; their dispatch is based on their symbol
strings.  Apply executes them correctly as well.

In JACAL, polynomials are lists (of variable and coefficients) so that
polynomial operations use the fastest operations that SCM (and other
Scheme implementations) offers.  Changing polynomials to boxed record
types would have a disastrous impact on memory usage, cache locality,
and execution speed of JACAL.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports