Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs John Cowan (14 Jun 2010 19:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs David Rush (14 Jun 2010 21:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs Aaron W. Hsu (15 Jun 2010 00:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs Aaron W. Hsu 15 Jun 2010 00:04 UTC
On Monday 14 June 2010 17:11:16 David Rush wrote:
> So to summarize, i suspect that the
> incidence of mutated strings in real code is several order of magnitude
> lower than the use of mutable cons cells and might be vanishingly small...

To give a differing opinion, I should report that I use mutated strings quite
often. I also use mutable pairs quite often.

	Aaron W. Hsu
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports