Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions Alex Shinn (02 Jun 2011 23:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions Jim Rees (03 Jun 2011 12:24 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions Andre van Tonder (03 Jun 2011 21:41 UTC)
Re: 5.3 Syntax Definitions Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Jun 2011 21:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions Alex Shinn 02 Jun 2011 23:20 UTC

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Jonathan Kraut <jak76@columbia.edu> wrote:
> I hope WG1 will reconsider lifting the restriction that "any internal
> syntax definitions in a body must come before any internal definitions."

This was brought up earlier and we're open to
changing it, subject to the restriction that using
a syntax definition before the definition is an error.

We also need to specify the result of redefining
internal definitions (as syntax or otherwise).  The
R6RS is unclear on this - I'm inclined to just make
it an error.

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports