On Sun 06 Jan 2013 07:55, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@gmail.com> writes:

>     I would change the "Incompatibilities with R6RS" to "Differences
>     from
>     R6RS", and be a lot less snarky and defensive.
>
> My preference is to remove the entire section about R6RS.
> It's the job of the small language to be compatible of R5RS,
> and the job of the large language to be compatible with R6RS,
> so this entire section belongs in the WG2 report.

FWIW, I agree with you.

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports