Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Marc Feeley (01 Jul 2012 12:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Alex Shinn (01 Jul 2012 20:28 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Marc Feeley (02 Jul 2012 12:08 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Alaric Snell-Pym (02 Jul 2012 12:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan (03 Jul 2012 07:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Alaric Snell-Pym (03 Jul 2012 08:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Pierpaolo Bernardi (03 Jul 2012 09:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan (03 Jul 2012 14:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Pierpaolo Bernardi (03 Jul 2012 15:58 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan (04 Jul 2012 04:22 UTC)
(missing)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan (05 Jul 2012 02:25 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan (03 Jul 2012 03:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Pierpaolo Bernardi 03 Jul 2012 15:58 UTC

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:44 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Pierpaolo Bernardi scripsit:

> The Roman-numeral characters (which are only present for backward
> compatibility with certain other character sets) aren't decimal digits,
> and therefore R7RS `char-numeric?` returns #f on them.  So things aren't
> as bad as that: all the decimal digits are used in exactly the same way,
> only the shapes differ from European digits.

I stand corrected.  Thanks.

P.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports