Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
Marc Feeley
(01 Jul 2012 12:55 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
Alex Shinn
(01 Jul 2012 20:28 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
Marc Feeley
(02 Jul 2012 12:08 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
Alaric Snell-Pym
(02 Jul 2012 12:21 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
John Cowan
(03 Jul 2012 07:16 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
Alaric Snell-Pym
(03 Jul 2012 08:50 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(03 Jul 2012 09:11 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
John Cowan
(03 Jul 2012 14:45 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Pierpaolo Bernardi (03 Jul 2012 15:58 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
John Cowan
(04 Jul 2012 04:22 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
John Cowan
(05 Jul 2012 02:25 UTC)
|
||
Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
John Cowan
(03 Jul 2012 03:19 UTC)
|
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:44 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Pierpaolo Bernardi scripsit: > The Roman-numeral characters (which are only present for backward > compatibility with certain other character sets) aren't decimal digits, > and therefore R7RS `char-numeric?` returns #f on them. So things aren't > as bad as that: all the decimal digits are used in exactly the same way, > only the shapes differ from European digits. I stand corrected. Thanks. P. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports