On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Jussi Piitulainen
> <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>>
>> Do all these need to remain in the language? In (scheme base)?
>
> We should put them somewhere for compatibility, but
> I definitely think everything but the one and two depth
> combinations should be removed from (scheme base).
> Their use is generally a code smell.  People should
> use destructuring, records, or SRFI-1 first..tenth accessors.

Is this a case where common practice among Scheme implementation is
the functions are no longer valued so they are going away?

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports