Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? | Simplelists

[Scheme-reports] EVAL Andre van Tonder (23 Apr 2011 23:47 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...) Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 00:04 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 00:15 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] COND, CASE, AND, ... macros are buggy Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 00:24 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Buggy definition of BEGIN Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 00:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Buggy definition of BEGIN Jussi Piitulainen (24 Apr 2011 06:55 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Restrictions on internal BEGIN? Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 01:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Restrictions on internal BEGIN? Jussi Piitulainen (24 Apr 2011 07:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] COND, CASE, AND, ... macros are buggy Alex Shinn (24 Apr 2011 02:29 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 02:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping Alex Shinn (24 Apr 2011 02:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping Aaron W. Hsu (29 Apr 2011 17:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping Aaron W. Hsu (29 Apr 2011 17:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (24 Apr 2011 13:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Peter Bex (24 Apr 2011 13:55 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (24 Apr 2011 14:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Peter Bex (24 Apr 2011 15:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (24 Apr 2011 15:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Peter Bex (24 Apr 2011 15:21 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Peter Bex (24 Apr 2011 15:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 15:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (24 Apr 2011 17:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Peter Bex (24 Apr 2011 17:24 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Aaron W. Hsu (27 Apr 2011 06:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (27 Apr 2011 10:42 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (21 May 2011 12:39 UTC)

Re: Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Aaron W. Hsu (24 May 2011 18:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Per Bothner (24 May 2011 19:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (24 May 2011 21:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Aaron W. Hsu (25 May 2011 03:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Sztefan Edwards (25 May 2011 14:32 UTC)

Re: Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Aaron W. Hsu (25 May 2011 20:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (07 Nov 2011 11:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Jim Rees (07 Nov 2011 15:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (07 Nov 2011 16:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Perry E. Metzger (07 Nov 2011 18:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Perry E. Metzger (07 Nov 2011 18:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (08 Nov 2011 00:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? John Cowan (08 Nov 2011 00:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? John Cowan (27 Apr 2011 21:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Andy Wingo (27 Apr 2011 21:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? John Cowan (27 Apr 2011 21:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Jim Rees (28 Apr 2011 00:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...) Alex Shinn (24 Apr 2011 02:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...) Andre van Tonder (24 Apr 2011 03:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...) Peter Bex (24 Apr 2011 11:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...) Andy Wingo (24 Apr 2011 10:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...) Ray Dillinger (24 Apr 2011 16:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...) John Cowan (24 Apr 2011 21:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EVAL Alex Shinn (24 Apr 2011 02:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EVAL John Cowan (24 Apr 2011 06:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret? Perry E. Metzger 07 Nov 2011 18:39 UTC

Isn't all of this precisely why de Brujin indexes were invented?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn_index

Perry

On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:02:07 +0100 Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2011 16:17, Jim Rees <jimreesma@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I just use lots of randomness in my generated names.   Collisions
> > will happen, but only once every trillion years or so.
>
> That's fine also.  However I wanted to be able to recompile the same
> file and get the same names.  It would be nice to be able to edit
> the file in some number of prescribed ways and also get the same
> names. Currently, deriving the name from the definition form gives
> me the latter, though at some cost (see original mail).
>
> Andy

--
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports