Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 20:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (12 Aug 2011 20:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 20:59 UTC)
Re: "include" filename resolution Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Aug 2011 21:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 21:42 UTC)
Re: "include" filename resolution Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Aug 2011 21:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (12 Aug 2011 21:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Ray Dillinger (13 Aug 2011 15:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay 12 Aug 2011 21:42 UTC

Two minutes ago, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> > And given that the latter will be popular for a while longer, it's
> > especially surprising that it's different from inside a module.
> > Given that, it might make more sense to have it use the CWD when
> > used on the REPL, and throw a syntax error from inside a module.
>
> I'm curious about what you mean by "... will be popular for a while
> longer...."  Is there some reason that REPLs are likely to fade from
> popularity?

I meant uses of `load'.

--
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!