Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 20:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (12 Aug 2011 20:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 20:59 UTC)
Re: "include" filename resolution Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Aug 2011 21:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 21:42 UTC)
Re: "include" filename resolution Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Aug 2011 21:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (12 Aug 2011 21:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Ray Dillinger (13 Aug 2011 15:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo 12 Aug 2011 20:53 UTC

On Fri 12 Aug 2011 22:38, Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org> writes:

> what if you have (define myload load)?

I think that `load' is almost never what you want.  When you're using
it, you're already lost.  Given that, you just have to choose the least
bad option.  Guile's thing is bad, but it's not as bad as using (e.g.)
the current working directory.

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports