current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake Taylor R Campbell (10 Dec 2010 03:28 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake Thomas Bushnell, BSG (10 Dec 2010 22:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake Alaric Snell-Pym (11 Dec 2010 13:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake Thomas Bushnell, BSG (17 Dec 2010 23:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake Alaric Snell-Pym 11 Dec 2010 13:40 UTC

On 12/11/10 04:29, John Cowan wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG scripsit:
>
>> This is still a great misunderstanding. Many computers have perfectly good
>> accuracy on that level without any trouble, because they use things like NTP
>> to keep themselves in sync.
>
> NTP on the open Internet can keep you accurate to maybe 5-10 ms, no better.
>

5-10ms is dwarfed by a 1s difference between IAT and posix seconds :-)

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports