Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
John Cowan 18 Feb 2014 01:14 UTC
Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer scripsit:
> If anything, we should special case them to mention that immutable
> records might share structure even when returned from distinct calls to
> a constructor, akin to how literals can share structure because they're
> immutable.
I would rather have a separate set of types for immutable records in the
large language.
--
Not to perambulate John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
the corridors http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
during the hours of repose
in the boots of ascension. --Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports