On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:
>
>> On a system that that invokes a compiler on the argument of EVAL, the compiler
>> may depend on the textual representation of the code '(cons 1 2).  It may even
>> do certain optimizations and rewritings based on the textual representation.
>> Again, having procedure objects in here confuses levels and can cause problems
>> for such a compiler.
>
> Does it really? Can anyone point to an implementation of EVAL that can't
> cope with this?

I don't think Larceny's eval can cope with this.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports