Kevin Wortman scripsit:

> +1. By the principle of minimal surprise, I would prefer to either make do
> with using two conventional procedures, or create a new type that behaves
> like a conventional record.

I've decided to go with the second choice.

> Actually a comparator can be defined by just a well-behaved < predicate and
> a hash procedure,

True, but that can be very costly, especially for non-atomic data.

--
Is not a patron, my Lord [Chesterfield],        John Cowan
one who looks with unconcern on a man           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
struggling for life in the water, and when      cowan@ccil.org
he has reached ground encumbers him with help?
        --Samuel Johnson

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.