Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers

Show/hide message thread

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym (12 May 2011 09:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Andy Wingo (12 May 2011 10:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym (12 May 2011 11:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Jim Rees (12 May 2011 12:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Andy Wingo (12 May 2011 14:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym (12 May 2011 15:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Aaron W. Hsu (12 May 2011 22:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Andy Wingo (12 May 2011 14:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Eli Barzilay (12 May 2011 17:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Per Bothner (12 May 2011 16:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym (12 May 2011 17:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Sztefan Edwards (12 May 2011 17:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Per Bothner (12 May 2011 17:27 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym (13 May 2011 08:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Aaron W. Hsu (12 May 2011 22:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym 12 May 2011 17:03 UTC

On 05/12/11 17:02, Per Bothner wrote:

> This solution works pretty well in Kawa, which has good column-level
> diagnostics.  There are some problems: You can't give a precise
> position to a symbol in the cdr of a dotted pair - but that is a minor
> problem since Scheme doesn't allow dotted pairs in non-quoted expressions.

O RLY?

Is (lambda (a b c . rest) ...) not legal?

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports