Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Andre van Tonder (03 Aug 2011 16:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 17:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Alex Queiroz (03 Aug 2011 18:09 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 18:39 UTC)
Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Aug 2011 20:48 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 21:10 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Aaron W. Hsu (03 Aug 2011 22:30 UTC)
Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Aug 2011 22:34 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Andre van Tonder 03 Aug 2011 16:30 UTC

On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Alex Shinn wrote:

> This could possibly be disastrous for implementor uptake, since one
> of the most common complaints against R6RS was its handling of
> top-levels, and specifically its forbidding of REPLs.

R6RS didn't forbid REPLs.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports