I'm reformulating the numeric tower ballot to eliminate talk of IEEE,
which is orthogonal to the questions being addressed.  I don't think
this will affect anyone's vote except maybe Bill Schottstaedt's.
If it does change your vote, go ahead and revote.  Those who haven't
voted and intend to, please vote!  As before, the vote closes at noon
on 2014-05-06, Universal Time.  (According to my calculations, Universal
Time is approximately 0.00002822495 light-smoots later than MIT Time.
That is, assuming I have not uglified where I should have derided or
vice versa.)

1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation
restrictions like memory) exact integers?

2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers?

3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers?

4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers?

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Go, and never darken my towels again!
        --Rufus T. Firefly

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.