Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
John Cowan 08 Jun 2012 20:30 UTC
Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit:
> Indeed, it needs to be triggered by a "hint" to the implementation that
> this is desirable, as the OP suggested. Whether that hint is to "call it
> a future" or something else is another matter :-)
I have added futures to the RevoteDocket, the list of packages that WG2
has not yet decided whether to work on or not.
--
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Monday we watch-a Firefly's house, but he no come out. He wasn't home.
Tuesday we go to the ball game, but he fool us. He no show up. Wednesday he
go to the ball game, and we fool him. We no show up. Thursday was a
double-header. Nobody show up. Friday it rained all day. There was no ball
game, so we stayed home and we listened to it on-a the radio. --Chicolini
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports