Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
John Cowan 12 Oct 2012 02:25 UTC
Vassil Nikolov scripsit:
> By the way, what would an `if' with multiple
> name-value pairs offer that `cond' doesn't?
Fewer parentheses, a feature very important to Lisp programmers. :-)
--
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Sir, I quite agree with you, but what are we two against so many?
--George Bernard Shaw,
to a man booing at the opening of _Arms and the Man_
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports