Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan 12 Oct 2012 02:25 UTC

Vassil Nikolov scripsit:

>   By the way, what would an `if' with multiple
>   name-value pairs offer that `cond' doesn't?

Fewer parentheses, a feature very important to Lisp programmers.  :-)

--
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Sir, I quite agree with you, but what are we two against so many?
    --George Bernard Shaw,
         to a man booing at the opening of _Arms and the Man_

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports