Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter John Cowan (30 Oct 2009 18:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter Aaron W. Hsu (31 Oct 2009 23:46 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter John Cowan (01 Nov 2009 03:00 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter Aaron W. Hsu (01 Nov 2009 03:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter John Cowan 30 Oct 2009 18:12 UTC

Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

>
> >Also the fact that the contents of the libraries were entirely ad hoc.
>
> Could you clarify exactly what you mean by that?

Although some of the libraries were pushed through the SRFI process,
they were not properly marinated by being implemented and used heavily to
flush out design and usability bugs.  Only on very rare occasions should
something be standardized that has not been in widespread use already.

--
De plichten van een docent zijn divers,         John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook.                         cowan@ccil.org
      --Edsger Dijkstra                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports