Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
John Cowan 30 Oct 2009 18:12 UTC
Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:
>
> >Also the fact that the contents of the libraries were entirely ad hoc.
>
> Could you clarify exactly what you mean by that?
Although some of the libraries were pushed through the SRFI process,
they were not properly marinated by being implemented and used heavily to
flush out design and usability bugs. Only on very rare occasions should
something be standardized that has not been in widespread use already.
--
De plichten van een docent zijn divers, John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook. cowan@ccil.org
--Edsger Dijkstra http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports