[Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (19 May 2011 17:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (20 May 2011 03:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 07:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 09:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andre van Tonder (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (21 May 2011 22:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 14:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (22 May 2011 17:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (23 May 2011 22:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo 19 May 2011 17:05 UTC

`make-blob' needs a fill argument.  (Filling it with random memory is a
potential security vulnerability in many contexts.)

Someone mentioned (Peter?) that partial-bloc and partial-blob-copy!
could be rolled into blob-copy and blob-copy!, and I agree very much.  I
like the language about copy direction; that was very carefully done.

There is no read syntax for blobs; I think this is an error.  What about
good ol' #vu8().

What would you call a sub-blob which shares state with another blob?
"subblob" is very blub, but the analogy to strings is quite strong, and
perhaps indeed blob-copy should be subblob.  But oh, the voiced labial
plosives!

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports