Group Email Manager

login signup
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case) John Cowan (22 Dec 2010 17:01 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo Peter Kourzanov (22 Dec 2010 20:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (23 Dec 2010 19:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (24 Dec 2010 00:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Peter Kourzanov (22 Dec 2010 20:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Eli Barzilay (22 Dec 2010 23:37 UTC)
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case) John Cowan 22 Dec 2010 16:55 UTC 
Eli Barzilay scripsit:

> Is there really any implementation where
>
>   (let ((eqv? #f)) (case 1 ((1) 1)))
>
> throws an error?  (I don't know of any, but if there is one, it should
> be a case for a bug report rather than something to draw conclusions
> from.)

Yes: Bigloo, STklos, and Scheme 9 all have this problem.  Racket, Gauche,
MIT, Gambit, Chicken, Scheme48/scsh, Guile, Kawa, SISC, Chibi, Chez,
SCM, Ikarus, Larceny, Ypsilon, Mosh, and SSCM do not.

--
John Cowan                              <cowan@ccil.org>
            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
                Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss