Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Andre van Tonder (21 May 2011 20:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" John Cowan (21 May 2011 20:42 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Andre van Tonder (22 May 2011 21:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Alex Shinn (22 May 2011 22:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" John Cowan (23 May 2011 02:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Alaric Snell-Pym (23 May 2011 11:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Eli Barzilay (23 May 2011 12:19 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Alaric Snell-Pym (23 May 2011 12:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" John Cowan 23 May 2011 02:55 UTC

Andre van Tonder scripsit:

> But if WG1-voted decisions are written in stone as you say, then it makes
> little sense for this discussion group to even continue.  What was the
> point then of making the draft public?  I will henceforth stop my
> "moaning"/participation here.  I wish you good luck.

They are *not* written in stone; they are merely not going to be changed
unless there is new evidence to bring forward.

--
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Dievas dave dantis; Dievas duos duonos          --Lithuanian proverb
Deus dedit dentes; deus dabit panem             --Latin version thereof
Deity donated dentition;
  deity'll donate doughnuts                     --English version by Muke Tever
God gave gums; God'll give granary              --Version by Mat McVeagh

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports