Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN John Cowan (29 Sep 2011 20:29 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN Alex Shinn (30 Sep 2011 00:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN Alex Shinn (30 Sep 2011 04:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN John Cowan (30 Sep 2011 06:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN John Cowan (30 Sep 2011 04:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN John Cowan 29 Sep 2011 20:29 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> I'll modify the draft to use R6RS semantics, and
> re-open this for confirmation in the next ballot.

Let's let this conversation work itself out first, please.

--
John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand
on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability.
Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land,
to add something to the extent and the solidity of our possessions.
        --Thomas Henry Huxley

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports