John Cowan scripsit:

> > One final question: Why was the +nan.0 syntax copied from R6RS but not
> > the -nan.0 syntax?  I think it makes sense to allow -nan.0 as well.
>
> It was an oversight.  Ticket filed.

Racket, Gauche, Chicken, Guile, Chez, Ikarus, Larceny, Ypsilon, STklos all
support nan.0 and +nan.0 as equivalent forms. MIT, Bigloo, Scheme48/scsh,
SISC, SCM, Scheme 9 don't support either form. Only Gambit and Chibi
support +nan.0 but not -nan.0.

STklos prints both +nan.0 and -nan.0 as -nan.0.

--
De plichten van een docent zijn divers,         John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook.                         cowan@ccil.org
      --Edsger Dijkstra                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports