Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
John Cowan 16 Aug 2011 21:15 UTC
Peter Bex scripsit:
> Why not allows implementations to choose whether they want to be
> backwards compatible in this way?
That was proposed but failed to pass.
> If # is not specified in the standard it can still be supported by
> individual implementations, right?
Yes.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
If he has seen farther than others,
it is because he is standing on a stack of dwarves.
--Mike Champion, describing Tim Berners-Lee (adapted)
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports