Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (06 Aug 2011 21:53 UTC)
Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Arthur A. Gleckler (06 Aug 2011 22:36 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Denis Washington (07 Aug 2011 09:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (07 Aug 2011 18:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan 07 Aug 2011 18:09 UTC

Denis Washington scripsit:

> I was not arguing about the separation of syntax and procedures, but
> about how the description of delay/lazy/force is distributed among them.
> Ideally, the description in one chapter (preferrably chapter 4) is
> minimal - not much more than a reference - and everything else described
> in the other. Currently, they are important parts of the description in
> both chapters which, regardless of where you start, requires you to jump
> to the other chapter to get the full picture.

Editorial ticket filed, but this may not get done.

--
Note that nobody these days would clamor for fundamental laws        John Cowan
of *the theory of kangaroos*, showing why pseudo-kangaroos are   cowan@ccil.org
physically, logically, metaphysically impossible.    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Kangaroos are wonderful, but not *that* wonderful.     --Dan Dennett on zombies

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports