Two new errata are available for R7RS-small:

17.  In the first bullet of the "Incompatibilities with R6RS" section,
for "have to be be" read "have to be".

18.  In numeric tower bullet of the "Incompatibilities with R6RS"
section, for "but the R6RS procedures real-valued?, rational-valued?, and
integer-valued? were not" read "but the semantics of the R6RS procedures
real?, rational?, and integer? were not adopted. (Note that the R5RS/R7RS
semantics are available in R6RS using real-valued?, rational-valued?,
and integer-valued?)".

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under
tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous
languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or
obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on
unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness.
                   --Felix Winkelmann

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports