Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small John Cowan (09 May 2013 01:40 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small Arthur Smyles (09 May 2013 02:12 UTC)
Re: Ratification vote for R7RS-small Arthur A. Gleckler (09 May 2013 02:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small John Cowan 09 May 2013 01:40 UTC

Arthur Smyles scripsit:

> Full name: Arthur Smyles
> Location: New York, New York, USA
> Vote: Yes
> Rationale: The process of creating the standard was true to the
> charter. It was performed in a transparent manner. My only criticism
> was that new api were added by the working group during the public
> review period without adequate ability for the public to review. I
> would like to thank the Working Group for the hard, detailed work
> that was done to make this standard a reality.

Please add a statement of interest, or we can't consider this vote.

--
I am expressing my opinion.  When my            John Cowan
honorable and gallant friend is called,         cowan@ccil.org
he will express his opinion.  This is           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
the process which we call Debate.                   --Winston Churchill

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports