---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Felix <felix@call-with-current-continuation.org>
Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
To: Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl
Cc: denisw@online.de, asandroq@gmail.com

Alex Shinn did a poll on the "scheme-implementors" mailing list
recently (a non-public mailing list hosted by google groups) and from
what I could see (not much, I assume most implementors gave their
opinion privately to the editors), many implementors seem to be fine
with the draft. It is not so different from R5RS, and the module
system looks straightforward enough (WG1 doesn't touch the tricky
issues like procedural macros and phase-separation, etc. - it only
requires "syntax-rules"). So, I think the draft is taken positively,
at least by those that aren't too committed to R6RS.

(Note: I asked to be unsubscribed from scheme-implementors, so I can't
give any more information)

cheers,
felix

--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports