Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan (12 Oct 2012 02:53 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan 12 Oct 2012 02:52 UTC

John Boyle scripsit:

> Can you explain further, perhaps give code that works?  I've used let,
> flet, and macrolet to rebind cl:if, and tried to run defmacro under that
> binding, and none of them worked (in CLisp or SBCL).

IF is a symbol in the CL package, and attempts to rebind or redefine symbols
in that package don't work.  So you need to create a symbol in some other
package by saying (shadow 'if), which forces the current package to contain
a separate IF symbol unrelated to CL:IF.  You can then define that
however you want.

In standard Scheme there are no packages, so there is only one symbol
named "if".  However, you can rebind or redefine it as you will.  In R6RS
and R7RS, you need to exclude it when you import the base library.

--
John Cowan            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan     cowan@ccil.org
Uneasy lies the head that wears the Editor's hat! --Eddie Foirbeis Climo

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports