|
[Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Andy Wingo (19 May 2011 15:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(19 May 2011 16:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(19 May 2011 17:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alex Shinn
(21 May 2011 05:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(21 May 2011 08:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Jim Rees
(21 May 2011 13:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(21 May 2011 15:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(21 May 2011 18:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(22 May 2011 13:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andre van Tonder
(21 May 2011 15:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alex Shinn
(21 May 2011 18:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 11:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(23 May 2011 15:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 11:20 UTC)
|
Suggestion: replace every instance of "an unspecified value", "value is unspecified", "result is unspecified" and the like with "unspecified values". This would permit the elegant approach of defining control constructs with no logical value to return 0 values. This follows the R6RS. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
