Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] SRFI 117, Mutable queues taylanbayirli@gmail.com (04 Dec 2014 09:15 UTC)
Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] SRFI 117, Mutable queues John Cowan (05 Dec 2014 01:47 UTC)
Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] SRFI 117, Mutable queues taylanbayirli@gmail.com (05 Dec 2014 08:33 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] SRFI 117, Mutable queues taylanbayirli@gmail.com 04 Dec 2014 09:15 UTC

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes:

> We're discussing SRFI 117, Mutable queues.  I intend to propose this
> for R7RS-large.

Should `set-queue-from-list!' and `set-queue-from-first-last!' not be
called `set-queue-list!' and `set-queue-first-last!'?

I'm not sure when `queue-concatenate' should be used in code that wants
to be portable.  If no limit is defined for the length of the argument
list of `apply', then I can only do guesswork.  And the whole thing
seems like a huge kludge; can implementations with such a limit not
solve the issue in a way other than to burden not only the programmer
but even the whole standard?

Taylan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.