On Fri 20 May 2011 07:17, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@gmail.com> writes:

>> Funally the result of invoking a continuation captured at the toplevel
>> is not mentioned.  On purpose?
>
> Yes.  Have you ever seen a sane proposal for specifying
> this that all implementations could easily support?! :O

No :)

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports