John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:

> This is the LAST CALL for votes on the numeric tower ballot, which is
> currently worded as follows:
>
> 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation
> restrictions like memory) exact integers?

Yes.

> 2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers?

Yes.

> 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers?

No opinion.

> 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers?

No opinion.

    All the best,

J.-M. Hufflen

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports