Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (30 Oct 2010 07:00 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aubrey Jaffer (30 Oct 2010 14:14 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aaron W. Hsu (30 Oct 2010 22:05 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (30 Oct 2010 22:46 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aubrey Jaffer (30 Oct 2010 23:03 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (31 Oct 2010 06:16 UTC)

Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan 30 Oct 2010 06:59 UTC

Aubrey Jaffer scripsit:

> Exposing port-numbers to the programmer leads to resource leaks
> (orphaned ports).

I don't understand that.  The SCM socket:bind, socket:connect, and
socket-name:port-number procedures all expose port numbers, and I don't
understand how you can implement TFTP without knowing about them.

Are you momentarily confusing port numbers with file descriptors?

> The SCM socket library is a complete socket interface overloading
> ports.  Socket ports, like file ports, are subject to garbage
> collection.

I quite like it, but it doesn't meet my requirements.  I'll look into
cutting it down so it does.

--
If you have ever wondered if you are in hell,         John Cowan
it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled     http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
road of spiritual inquiry.  If you are absolutely     cowan-PrmTNUR8zL8@public.gmane.org
sure you are in hell, however, then you must be
on the Cross Bronx Expressway.          --Alan Feuer, NYTimes, 2002-09-20