Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case) John Cowan (23 Dec 2010 06:05 UTC)

Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case) John Cowan 23 Dec 2010 06:04 UTC

Eli Barzilay scripsit:

> > R6RS provided a module system
>
> Still does.

By "R6RS" I mean the process, not the product.

> There are some implementations that provide module systems and a
> (deterministic) repl.

Can you elaborate on this?  Obviously, it's possible to have *some*
sort of REPL, such as the one discussed some months ago in which typing
#!r6rs throws away the world and implicitly starts over with an empty
top-level program.  But that's nothing like a Scheme REPL as we know it.

--
A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax."                  John Cowan
Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?"  cowan@ccil.org
  --"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss