Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
John Cowan 23 Dec 2010 06:04 UTC
Eli Barzilay scripsit:
> > R6RS provided a module system
>
> Still does.
By "R6RS" I mean the process, not the product.
> There are some implementations that provide module systems and a
> (deterministic) repl.
Can you elaborate on this? Obviously, it's possible to have *some*
sort of REPL, such as the one discussed some months ago in which typing
#!r6rs throws away the world and implicitly starts over with an empty
top-level program. But that's nothing like a Scheme REPL as we know it.
--
A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax." John Cowan
Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?" cowan@ccil.org
--"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss