Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE Andre van Tonder (23 Apr 2011 23:29 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE Ray Dillinger (24 Apr 2011 01:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE Andre van Tonder 23 Apr 2011 23:29 UTC

On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Eli Barzilay wrote:

> Andre suggests
> removing them in their current form from the language which IMO is at
> least as justified as not including `lazy'.

Yes, my suggestion would be to remove them from the WG1 language.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports