[Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def? Andre van Tonder (25 Apr 2011 02:27 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def? Andre van Tonder 25 Apr 2011 02:27 UTC

According to the descroption on p. 20, the record type <name> is bound to a
representation of the record type.

But how about the field names?  Are they bound to anything by the record type
definition.  If not, why do we have them?  What is their function?

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports