Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan (08 Jun 2013 03:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Kevin Millikin (09 Jun 2013 07:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan 08 Jun 2013 03:29 UTC

Andy Wingo scripsit:

> For implementations with flat closures, you compare the code pointer and
> each captured variable.  (Mutated variables are captured in a box.)

They don't have to be: in Rabbit they were not, and the compiler kept
track of which closure a mutable variable was actually in.

--
If you understand,                      John Cowan
   things are just as they are;         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
if you do not understand,               cowan@ccil.org
   things are just as they are.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports