Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Denis Washington 31 Aug 2011 06:56 UTC

Am 31.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler:
> "r7rs-big" and "r7rs-small" are perfectly good names.

In my opinion, they are awful. What should the reports be named, then?
"The Small Report on [...] Scheme" and "The Big Report on [...] Scheme"?
Sounds like they are differently detailed reports on the same thing,
which is clearly not the case.

I think we need something better.

Regards,
Denis