Date Index - December 2013 - Scheme Reports

01 Dec 2013 03:04 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition	Alex Shinn
01 Dec 2013 05:07 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition	John Cowan
01 Dec 2013 07:04 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition	Alex Shinn
01 Dec 2013 09:05 UTC	[Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?	Yuichi Nishiwaki
01 Dec 2013 12:09 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?	Alex Shinn
01 Dec 2013 14:04 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition	Jussi Piitulainen
01 Dec 2013 15:59 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?	Yuichi Nishiwaki
01 Dec 2013 17:53 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?	Alex Shinn
01 Dec 2013 20:13 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?	John Cowan
01 Dec 2013 22:33 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition	John Cowan
02 Dec 2013 00:28 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition	John Cowan
02 Dec 2013 13:44 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?	Yuichi Nishiwaki
04 Dec 2013 04:27 UTC	[scheme-reports-wg2] New versions of SRFI 113 and 114	John Cowan
10 Dec 2013 19:13 UTC	[Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3?	Yuichi Nishiwaki
10 Dec 2013 21:33 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3?	John Cowan
10 Dec 2013 23:31 UTC	Re: [Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3?	Yuichi Nishiwaki