| 03 Aug 2012 20:34 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] WG1BallotRead published, John Cowan's comments |
John Cowan |
| 03 Aug 2012 20:46 UTC |
Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] WG1BallotRead published, John Cowan's comments |
Bradley Lucier |
| 07 Aug 2012 19:57 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this |
Mark H Weaver |
| 07 Aug 2012 20:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this |
Mark H Weaver |
| 08 Aug 2012 00:41 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this |
Alex Shinn |
| 08 Aug 2012 03:15 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this |
Vassil Nikolov |
| 08 Aug 2012 11:45 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) |
Mark H Weaver |
| 08 Aug 2012 11:55 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) |
Alex Shinn |
| 08 Aug 2012 18:08 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) |
Mark H Weaver |
| 09 Aug 2012 02:20 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Noah Lavine |
| 09 Aug 2012 07:41 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 09 Aug 2012 07:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Alex Shinn |
| 09 Aug 2012 21:46 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Noah Lavine |
| 09 Aug 2012 22:53 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Alex Shinn |
| 12 Aug 2012 03:46 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Ray Dillinger |
| 12 Aug 2012 12:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Noah Lavine |
| 12 Aug 2012 16:03 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics |
Mark H Weaver |
| 13 Aug 2012 18:01 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations |
Mark H Weaver |
| 13 Aug 2012 19:02 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. |
Ray Dillinger |
| 13 Aug 2012 21:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. |
John Cowan |
| 13 Aug 2012 22:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. |
Mark H Weaver |
| 14 Aug 2012 02:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. |
Ray Dillinger |
| 14 Aug 2012 02:56 UTC |
Re: eq? considered harmful. |
Arthur A. Gleckler |
| 14 Aug 2012 05:33 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. |
Mark H Weaver |
| 14 Aug 2012 09:59 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations |
Bill Schottstaedt |
| 19 Aug 2012 09:26 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 19 Aug 2012 09:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
Andy Wingo |
| 19 Aug 2012 09:38 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Peter Bex |
| 20 Aug 2012 03:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Alex Shinn |
| 20 Aug 2012 07:55 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 20 Aug 2012 08:28 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Alex Shinn |
| 20 Aug 2012 10:36 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 20 Aug 2012 10:53 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 20 Aug 2012 13:02 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 20 Aug 2012 14:43 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 20 Aug 2012 15:05 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 21 Aug 2012 02:37 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Alex Shinn |
| 21 Aug 2012 16:58 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 21 Aug 2012 18:42 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Peter Bex |
| 21 Aug 2012 19:09 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 21 Aug 2012 19:16 UTC |
Re: valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Arthur A. Gleckler |
| 21 Aug 2012 20:13 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Daniel Krueger |
| 21 Aug 2012 20:24 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
John Cowan |
| 21 Aug 2012 23:55 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Alex Shinn |
| 22 Aug 2012 06:33 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 23 Aug 2012 07:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Alex Shinn |
| 23 Aug 2012 08:27 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
John Cowan |
| 23 Aug 2012 10:23 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
Andy Wingo |
| 23 Aug 2012 14:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? |
xacc.ide@gmail.com |
| 24 Aug 2012 04:37 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: new wording for eqv? |
John Cowan |
| 25 Aug 2012 01:40 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv? |
Vassil Nikolov |
| 26 Aug 2012 15:17 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero |
Mark H Weaver |
| 26 Aug 2012 15:42 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero |
John Cowan |
| 29 Aug 2012 12:18 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
David A. Wheeler |
| 29 Aug 2012 22:54 UTC |
Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
John Cowan |
| 30 Aug 2012 00:49 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
Alex Shinn |
| 30 Aug 2012 03:01 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
David A. Wheeler |
| 30 Aug 2012 04:27 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
Ray Dillinger |
| 30 Aug 2012 06:43 UTC |
Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
John Cowan |
| 30 Aug 2012 12:54 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
David A. Wheeler |
| 30 Aug 2012 17:08 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
Per Bothner |
| 30 Aug 2012 18:58 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
Ray Dillinger |
| 30 Aug 2012 19:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
Ray Dillinger |
| 31 Aug 2012 08:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
John Boyle |
| 31 Aug 2012 12:03 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
Pierpaolo Bernardi |
| 31 Aug 2012 15:22 UTC |
Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
John Cowan |
| 31 Aug 2012 17:27 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 31 Aug 2012 18:37 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
John Boyle |
| 31 Aug 2012 21:40 UTC |
Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
John Cowan |
| 31 Aug 2012 21:47 UTC |
Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" |
John Cowan |
