| 01 Mar 2012 12:40 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
Alex Shinn |
| 01 Mar 2012 13:08 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
Manuel Simoni |
| 01 Mar 2012 13:20 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
Alex Shinn |
| 01 Mar 2012 16:38 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 01 Mar 2012 18:38 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] Equality of records |
John Cowan |
| 01 Mar 2012 19:15 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records |
Ray Dillinger |
| 02 Mar 2012 01:45 UTC |
Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Equality of records |
Alex Shinn |
| 02 Mar 2012 11:42 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
Alex Shinn |
| 02 Mar 2012 16:51 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records |
John Cowan |
| 02 Mar 2012 16:57 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
John Cowan |
| 02 Mar 2012 17:04 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 03 Mar 2012 23:29 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 |
John Cowan |
| 04 Mar 2012 08:41 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists |
John Cowan |
| 04 Mar 2012 16:43 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists |
Ray Dillinger |
| 04 Mar 2012 19:50 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists |
John Cowan |
| 04 Mar 2012 20:14 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists |
Per Bothner |
| 04 Mar 2012 20:42 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists |
Eli Barzilay |
| 04 Mar 2012 21:26 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists |
Per Bothner |
| 05 Mar 2012 02:23 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Centered Division |
Noah Lavine |
| 11 Mar 2012 12:17 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
Alex Shinn |
| 11 Mar 2012 19:28 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc |
John Cowan |
| 11 Mar 2012 20:05 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification |
John Cowan |
| 11 Mar 2012 22:24 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 12 Mar 2012 01:47 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification |
John Cowan |
| 12 Mar 2012 04:29 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. |
Alan Watson |
| 12 Mar 2012 05:03 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. |
John Cowan |
| 12 Mar 2012 22:15 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Arthur Smyles |
| 13 Mar 2012 00:28 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
John Cowan |
| 13 Mar 2012 01:54 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Arthur Smyles |
| 13 Mar 2012 02:08 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Alex Shinn |
| 13 Mar 2012 02:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Andrew Robbins |
| 13 Mar 2012 03:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Alex Shinn |
| 13 Mar 2012 03:37 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Arthur Smyles |
| 13 Mar 2012 04:47 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
John Cowan |
| 13 Mar 2012 05:02 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
John Cowan |
| 13 Mar 2012 05:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Alex Shinn |
| 13 Mar 2012 08:53 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Ray Dillinger |
| 13 Mar 2012 09:29 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Peter Bex |
| 13 Mar 2012 09:48 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification |
Marijn |
| 13 Mar 2012 11:41 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 13 Mar 2012 16:57 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Ray Dillinger |
| 13 Mar 2012 17:34 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification |
John Cowan |
| 13 Mar 2012 17:57 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification |
Per Bothner |
| 13 Mar 2012 19:54 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 14 Mar 2012 00:33 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Alex Shinn |
| 14 Mar 2012 03:58 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. |
Alan Watson |
| 14 Mar 2012 04:52 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. |
Alex Shinn |
| 14 Mar 2012 05:26 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. |
Alan Watson |
| 14 Mar 2012 05:46 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. |
Alex Shinn |
| 14 Mar 2012 17:32 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
Noah Lavine |
| 14 Mar 2012 17:47 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" |
John Cowan |
| 15 Mar 2012 05:54 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
Alan Watson |
| 15 Mar 2012 05:59 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
leppie |
| 15 Mar 2012 06:04 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
Alan Watson |
| 15 Mar 2012 06:10 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
leppie |
| 15 Mar 2012 06:17 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
Alan Watson |
| 15 Mar 2012 07:05 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
leppie |
| 15 Mar 2012 07:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
leppie |
| 15 Mar 2012 15:04 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
John Cowan |
| 15 Mar 2012 15:04 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
John Cowan |
| 16 Mar 2012 03:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
Alan Watson |
| 18 Mar 2012 04:19 UTC |
Re: parameterize missing parentheses |
Arthur A. Gleckler |
| 20 Mar 2012 05:47 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Per Bothner |
| 21 Mar 2012 03:29 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
John Cowan |
| 21 Mar 2012 06:51 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Helmut Eller |
| 21 Mar 2012 06:55 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Per Bothner |
| 21 Mar 2012 07:28 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
John Cowan |
| 21 Mar 2012 13:37 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Andy Wingo |
| 21 Mar 2012 19:46 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 21 Mar 2012 20:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
John Cowan |
| 21 Mar 2012 22:40 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Helmut Eller |
| 22 Mar 2012 05:15 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
leppie |
| 22 Mar 2012 08:27 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Helmut Eller |
| 22 Mar 2012 11:03 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
leppie |
| 22 Mar 2012 13:28 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Andy Wingo |
| 22 Mar 2012 14:17 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
John Cowan |
| 22 Mar 2012 16:36 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Helmut Eller |
| 22 Mar 2012 17:10 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 22 Mar 2012 18:09 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Helmut Eller |
| 22 Mar 2012 18:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Andy Wingo |
| 22 Mar 2012 19:02 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. |
Biep |
| 22 Mar 2012 19:40 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 22 Mar 2012 20:02 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value |
Peter Bex |
| 22 Mar 2012 23:30 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
John Cowan |
| 23 Mar 2012 04:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value |
John Cowan |
| 23 Mar 2012 06:11 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
Helmut Eller |
| 23 Mar 2012 06:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples |
John Cowan |
| 23 Mar 2012 09:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value |
Peter Bex |
| 23 Mar 2012 09:24 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value |
Peter Bex |
| 23 Mar 2012 14:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value |
John Cowan |
| 23 Mar 2012 17:58 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. |
John Cowan |
| 23 Mar 2012 19:13 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? |
Peter Bex |
| 23 Mar 2012 19:48 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? |
Andrew Robbins |
| 23 Mar 2012 19:54 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? |
Peter Bex |
| 23 Mar 2012 19:59 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? |
Peter Bex |
| 23 Mar 2012 20:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? |
John Cowan |
| 23 Mar 2012 20:32 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? |
John Cowan |
| 23 Mar 2012 21:26 UTC |
[scheme-reports-wg1] The history of EQV? on numbers |
John Cowan |
| 24 Mar 2012 00:48 UTC |
Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] The history of EQV? on numbers |
Bradley Lucier |
| 24 Mar 2012 12:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. |
Biep |
| 25 Mar 2012 04:01 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. |
John Cowan |
| 25 Mar 2012 15:06 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan |
Peter Bex |
| 25 Mar 2012 15:26 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan |
xacc.ide@gmail.com |
| 25 Mar 2012 18:33 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan |
John Cowan |
| 25 Mar 2012 20:50 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
quad |
| 25 Mar 2012 21:28 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Ref cells |
Biep |
| 26 Mar 2012 06:21 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
John Cowan |
| 26 Mar 2012 06:52 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 26 Mar 2012 14:29 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Andrew Robbins |
| 26 Mar 2012 14:51 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Stefan Edwards |
| 26 Mar 2012 15:03 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Andrew Robbins |
| 26 Mar 2012 15:26 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Stefan Edwards |
| 26 Mar 2012 16:16 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
quad |
| 26 Mar 2012 16:19 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
quad |
| 26 Mar 2012 16:26 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 26 Mar 2012 21:01 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
John Cowan |
| 26 Mar 2012 21:25 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Stefan Edwards |
| 27 Mar 2012 05:38 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Ref cells |
John Cowan |
| 27 Mar 2012 06:01 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
Alan Watson |
| 27 Mar 2012 14:01 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses |
John Cowan |
| 27 Mar 2012 15:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Andrew Robbins |
| 27 Mar 2012 15:50 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax |
Stefan Edwards |
| 28 Mar 2012 18:54 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
Alan Watson |
| 28 Mar 2012 20:32 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
Stefan Edwards |
| 28 Mar 2012 22:21 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
John Cowan |
| 28 Mar 2012 22:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
Stefan Edwards |
| 29 Mar 2012 04:32 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
John Cowan |
| 29 Mar 2012 05:53 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Alan Watson |
| 29 Mar 2012 14:03 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Alex Shinn |
| 29 Mar 2012 14:04 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
Stefan Edwards |
| 29 Mar 2012 15:36 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
John Cowan |
| 29 Mar 2012 15:41 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) |
Stefan Edwards |
| 29 Mar 2012 16:15 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
John Cowan |
| 29 Mar 2012 16:40 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Alan Watson |
| 29 Mar 2012 17:40 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
John Cowan |
| 29 Mar 2012 17:49 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS. |
Ray Dillinger |
| 29 Mar 2012 17:56 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 29 Mar 2012 18:14 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS. |
John Cowan |
| 29 Mar 2012 18:15 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
John Cowan |
| 29 Mar 2012 18:26 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Alan Watson |
| 29 Mar 2012 19:13 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Per Bothner |
| 29 Mar 2012 19:56 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 29 Mar 2012 20:18 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 29 Mar 2012 20:20 UTC |
Re: Bitwise operations on bytes |
Arthur A. Gleckler |
| 29 Mar 2012 20:30 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
John Cowan |
| 29 Mar 2012 20:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 29 Mar 2012 20:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes |
Per Bothner |
