Group Email Manager

login signup

Date Index - June 2012 - Scheme Reports

05 Jun 2012 15:07 UTC [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule Mike Morgan
06 Jun 2012 15:00 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
06 Jun 2012 16:45 UTC [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Duncan Steele
06 Jun 2012 19:16 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
06 Jun 2012 22:10 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
07 Jun 2012 02:34 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Mark H Weaver
07 Jun 2012 03:03 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
07 Jun 2012 09:26 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
07 Jun 2012 18:48 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
07 Jun 2012 18:59 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
07 Jun 2012 19:02 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
07 Jun 2012 19:09 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
07 Jun 2012 19:31 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
07 Jun 2012 19:31 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
07 Jun 2012 19:44 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
07 Jun 2012 19:45 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
07 Jun 2012 19:57 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
07 Jun 2012 19:59 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
07 Jun 2012 20:03 UTC Re: Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Arthur A. Gleckler
07 Jun 2012 20:23 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
07 Jun 2012 20:23 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
08 Jun 2012 09:35 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Eli Barzilay
08 Jun 2012 20:33 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
08 Jun 2012 23:33 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
10 Jun 2012 02:23 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
10 Jun 2012 03:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
10 Jun 2012 04:02 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
10 Jun 2012 08:50 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
11 Jun 2012 04:00 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
11 Jun 2012 04:24 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
11 Jun 2012 05:28 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
11 Jun 2012 05:37 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
11 Jun 2012 16:08 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
11 Jun 2012 19:35 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Ray Dillinger
11 Jun 2012 21:10 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
12 Jun 2012 10:17 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
12 Jun 2012 10:22 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
12 Jun 2012 10:28 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
12 Jun 2012 11:43 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
12 Jun 2012 19:04 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
12 Jun 2012 19:57 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
13 Jun 2012 01:48 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
13 Jun 2012 11:48 UTC [Scheme-reports] Unsafe optimizations Göran Weinholt
27 Jun 2012 16:54 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
27 Jun 2012 17:05 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
27 Jun 2012 18:44 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* Jussi Piitulainen
27 Jun 2012 19:53 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case Richard Kelsey
27 Jun 2012 20:05 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case Richard Kelsey
27 Jun 2012 20:21 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case Per Bothner
27 Jun 2012 20:35 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) Arthur Smyles
27 Jun 2012 20:43 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures? Richard Kelsey
27 Jun 2012 20:48 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) Arthur Smyles
27 Jun 2012 21:10 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports John Cowan
27 Jun 2012 21:11 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
27 Jun 2012 21:14 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
27 Jun 2012 22:12 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
28 Jun 2012 02:12 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
28 Jun 2012 03:59 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 04:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 04:52 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 04:55 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 05:04 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 05:06 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 05:21 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures? John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 05:37 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 07:27 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven Jussi Piitulainen
28 Jun 2012 08:12 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
28 Jun 2012 08:27 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
28 Jun 2012 08:40 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
28 Jun 2012 09:48 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
28 Jun 2012 12:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
28 Jun 2012 14:56 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Richard Kelsey
28 Jun 2012 21:21 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 22:00 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? John Cowan
28 Jun 2012 23:22 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Richard Kelsey
28 Jun 2012 23:27 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
29 Jun 2012 16:34 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
29 Jun 2012 16:58 UTC [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
29 Jun 2012 17:03 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Richard Kelsey
29 Jun 2012 17:09 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
29 Jun 2012 17:15 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
29 Jun 2012 17:31 UTC [Scheme-reports] minor editorial changes Richard Kelsey
29 Jun 2012 18:00 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS Jussi Piitulainen
29 Jun 2012 19:29 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS John Cowan
29 Jun 2012 19:39 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Richard Kelsey
29 Jun 2012 20:29 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Alex Shinn
29 Jun 2012 20:32 UTC [Scheme-reports] Reminder: R7RS public comment period William D Clinger
30 Jun 2012 01:20 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay